LNG’s supporters have received a boost from two new reports arguing that methane-based marine fuels have a role to play in shipping’s decarbonisation.
Lloyd’s Register and DNV have both published studies setting out the case for LNG, not as a final destination, but as a deployable fuel option that can support lower emissions now and provide a pathway towards bio-LNG and synthetic methane later.
For shipowners facing tightening global and regional regulation, that distinction matters. The debate over LNG has often been polarised between those who see it as a useful transition fuel and those who argue that it risks locking shipping into another fossil fuel. The latest reports do not remove that tension, but they do sharpen the question. If LNG infrastructure is already being installed at scale, can it be used to carry shipping towards lower-GHG methane fuels?
Lloyd’s Register’s latest Fuel for Thought report, LNG for Cruise, focuses on the passenger ship sector. Launched at Seatrade Cruise on 14 April, the report says LNG remains the most mature and immediately deployable alternative fuel available to cruise operators as emissions rules tighten.
That is a significant conclusion for a sector operating under close public scrutiny. Cruise ships call at high-profile ports, often close to cities and tourist destinations where air quality, visible emissions and local environmental impact are sensitive issues. LR says LNG is already delivering improved air quality and emissions performance and remains the most widely adopted alternative fuel in the cruise sector, both in the existing fleet and the orderbook.
The report examines LNG’s lifecycle performance, its treatment under IMO and EU regulatory regimes, and the economic implications of compliance mechanisms including FuelEU Maritime and the IMO Net Zero Framework. It also makes clear that LNG’s future credibility depends on continued progress in reducing methane slip, improving fuel supply, developing onboard abatement technologies and creating robust verification systems.
Francesco Ruisi, LR’s VP global passenger ship segment director, said: “For cruise operators, the report positions LNG not as an end point, but as a practical enabler of the industry’s decarbonisation pathway.
“With cruise ships operating in a highly visible and tightly regulated environment, the need to reduce emissions today while retaining the flexibility to adopt future fuels and technologies remains a critical consideration.”
DNV’s white paper, Methane in Shipping: LNG-fuelled ships and the switch to low-GHG methane, takes a wider view of the shipping market. It says the LNG-capable fleet now numbers around 800 vessels in operation, with more than 600 on order. That installed base is supported by established bunkering infrastructure, decades of operational experience and international safety standards.
DNV’s central point is that low-GHG methane, including biomethane and e-methane, is chemically compatible with LNG. That means it can be used in existing LNG-capable ships, tanks and bunkering systems. Existing LNG infrastructure can also handle liquefied low-GHG methane, offering a potential drop-in route for owners that have already invested in LNG-fuelled tonnage.
Cristina Saenz de Santa Maria, Interim CEO Maritime at DNV, said: “LNG to low-GHG methane is one viable pathway among several, and its role will vary by segment and trading pattern.”
She added that owners need to assess how different fuel options align with their routes, regulatory exposure and long-term fleet plans, while building flexibility into fuel strategies and maintaining strong energy-efficiency measures.
The DNV report also sets out the barriers. Low-GHG methane remains expensive, supply is limited, and there is no fully harmonised global rule set on chain-of-custody models such as mass balancing or book-and-claim. That creates uncertainty for shipowners, particularly where future compliance depends on whether a fuel’s certified emissions benefit is recognised by regulators.
DNV says liquefied biomethane bunker prices are currently several times higher than fossil LNG in major hubs such as Rotterdam. However, the effective gap can narrow once EU ETS and FuelEU Maritime costs are included. In some EU trades, liquefied biomethane has been reported as cost competitive with fossil fuel oil after those mechanisms are accounted for, although DNV stresses that this is not yet representative of the global picture.
However, environmental groups continue to challenge LNG’s transition-fuel credentials. Transport & Environment (T&E) has argued that EU port infrastructure policy risks locking in fossil gas infrastructure rather than driving full decarbonisation, while campaign groups including the Clean Arctic Alliance say methane slip and life-cycle emissions mean LNG cannot simply be treated as climate progress. That criticism applies not only to fossil LNG, but also to future methane pathways where, T&E argues, engine slip, upstream leakage and certification remain unresolved.
That challenge is likely to intensify as the LNG-fuelled fleet grows. For LNG advocates, the answer lies in three linked developments, reducing methane slip from engines, improving the greenhouse gas performance of the fuel supply chain, and scaling certified bio-LNG and e-methane.
Recent industry announcements suggest that some of that transition is beginning to take shape. Japanese shipping company Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, better known as “K” Line, has signed an agreement to support long-term procurement of carbon-neutral bio-LNG, or liquefied biomethane, and has started to use the fuel in LNG-fuelled car carriers. The company says the move is expected to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 60,800 tonnes a year.
“K” Line says the bio-LNG is produced from organic waste streams such as livestock waste and food residues. It is ISCC-EU certified, providing assurance that the fuel complies with sustainability and greenhouse gas reduction requirements under the European Union’s Renewable Energy Directive framework. The key operational point is that bio-LNG can be used in existing LNG-fuelled ships without major modification.
Infrastructure is also developing. Technology group Wärtsilä said in February that its Gas Solutions business will supply cargo handling and fuel gas supply systems for two new LNG bunkering vessels being built at Zhejiang XinLe Shipbuilding in China. The vessels, each of 20,000 m³ capacity, will be owned by a Hong Kong based shipowner and are expected to be delivered in the second half of 2027.
Wärtsilä’s scope includes LNG cargo handling systems, fuel gas supply systems, engineering and integrated control and monitoring for the complete cargo handling operation. Barry Yang, General Manager, Sales, China, Wärtsilä Gas Solutions, said LNG bunkering vessels are essential as LNG becomes more widely used as an interim marine fuel.
In Japan, Osaka Gas has also added to the infrastructure picture. The company has started ship-to-ship LNG bunkering, giving it capability across the three main supply methods, ship-to-ship, truck-to-ship and port-to-ship. Osaka Gas said its first ship-to-ship operation was carried out using the LNG bunkering vessel Seto Azure to supply a dual-fuel Capesize bulk carrier at JFE Steel Corporation’s West Japan Works in Fukuyama, Hiroshima.
SEA-LNG has also highlighted moves towards e-methane supply. In April, Titan Clean Fuels and TURN2X agreed an e-methane offtake arrangement intended to supply the maritime sector from 2028. Titan operates seven bunker vessels and says it can deliver in about 52 ports, underlining how existing LNG logistics could be used to bring renewable methane into the marine fuel market.
LNG remains both important and contested. It has scale, safety experience, a growing bunker network and a plausible route to lower-GHG methane. But its environmental case depends on measurable progress, not aspiration. Methane slip, upstream leakage, certification and regulatory recognition will determine whether LNG is seen as a major bridge to decarbonisation.

Constructive Media
Constructive Media
Hornbeam Suite
Mamhilad House
Mamhilad Park Estate
Pontypool
NP4 0HZ
Tel: 01495 239 962
Email: ibia@constructivemedia.co.uk

On behalf of:
IBIA London Office
Suite Lu.231
The Light Bulb
1 Filament Walk, Wandsworth
London, SW18 4GQ
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0) 20 3397 3850
Fax: +44 (0) 20 3397 3865
Email: ibia@ibia.net
Website: www.ibia.net

Emails
Publisher & Designer: Constructive Media
ibia@constructivemedia.co.uk
Editor: David Hughes
anderimar.news@googlemail.com
Project Manager: Alex Corboude
alex@worldbunkering.net